BUG MAEL MALAZAN FORUMS PLUS

I'm guessing that lots of people like the Sorry/Apsalar character? I find her. Although, towards the end, Kruppe was also becoming somewhat interesting. In book 1 the only one that was even remotely interesting to me was Tattersail and we know what happened to her in that book. That's basically what makes or breaks the book for me: if I'm not interested in the characters, what's the point of reading. It's not the timeline so much as the characters.

BUG MAEL MALAZAN FORUMS PLUS

Talk about Stockholm syndrome plus incredible naivete plus extreme paranoia Not a necessarily likeable character, but best written of the bunch.Д«ut, we'll see, not even halfway thought yet. You know, I think so far Felisin's my favourite in this book.

Most of all, SE's books hold up better on rereads than those of almost any other author.Д®ven Felisin? Every time I think about rereading DG, I think to myself, 'blech.the Chain of Dog is so grueling and boring.' Then I start rereading it and realize it's not. YKS, I don't remember exactly when, but some familiar characters do show up again. I think each book internally is fine, but there are some known inconsistencies between books and historically. Over at the forums, the common response is, 'the timeline doesn't matter.'ДЇor the most part, things have an order, but Erikson himself has said that readers shouldn't get caught up wondering which event happened when. But seriously starting to wonder if I should bother at all I paid good money for that lug of paper so I keep hoping it'll get better.

well, it sucks, it's all back to square 1.

Either that or I stopped caring about his preening in the foreword) and I managed to get my hopes up for the rest of the series. While book 1 ended quite interestingly after all (and he managed to get over his own pretentiousness. Question #2: does each book just ditch everything that happened in the previous one?

Bug mael malazan forums